IN SB0422 | 2015 | Regular Session

Status

Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Republican 6-2)
Status: Engrossed on February 19 2015 - 50% progression, died in committee
Action: 2015-03-05 - First Reading: referred to Committee on Ways and Means
Pending: House Ways and Means Committee
Text: Latest bill text (Engrossed) [PDF]

Summary

Court security fees and funds. Provides that a county, city, or town may adopted an ordinance to establish a local court security fee. Provides that the revenue provided to a county, city, or town from a local court security fee may be used only for local court security purposes. Provides that a redevelopment commission may provide revenue to a county, city, or town from property tax proceeds allocated to the redevelopment commission from a tax increment financing area, if the legislative body of the county, city, or town and the redevelopment commission adopt substantially similar authorizing resolutions following a joint

Tracking Information

Register now for our free OneVote public service or GAITS Pro trial account and you can begin tracking this and other legislation, all driven by the real-time data of the LegiScan API. Providing tools allowing you to research pending legislation, stay informed with email alerts, content feeds, and share dynamic reports. Use our new PolitiCorps to join with friends and collegaues to monitor & discuss bills through the process.

Monitor Legislation or view this same bill number from multiple sessions or take advantage of our national legislative search.

Title

Court security fees and funds. Provides that a county, city, or town may adopted an ordinance to establish a local court security fee. Provides that the revenue provided to a county, city, or town from a local court security fee may be used only for local court security purposes. Provides that a redevelopment commission may provide revenue to a county, city, or town from property tax proceeds allocated to the redevelopment commission from a tax increment financing area, if the legislative body of the county, city, or town and the redevelopment commission adopt substantially similar authorizing resolutions following a joint

Sponsors


Roll Calls

2015-02-17 - Senate - Senate - Third reading (Y: 33 N: 17 NV: 0 Abs: 0) [PASS]
2015-01-28 - Senate - Senate Committee on Judiciary - Committee Vote (Y: 7 N: 2 NV: 0 Abs: 0) [PASS]

History

DateChamberAction
2015-03-05HouseFirst Reading: referred to Committee on Ways and Means
2015-02-19SenateReferred to the House
2015-02-17SenateRepresentative Davisson added as cosponsor
2015-02-17SenateRepresentative McNamara added as sponsor
2015-02-17SenateThird reading: passed; Roll Call 173: yeas 33, nays 17
2015-02-12SenateSenator Niemeyer added as coauthor
2015-02-12SenateAmendment #3 (Grooms) prevailed; voice vote
2015-02-12SenateReread second time: amended, ordered engrossed
2015-02-10SenateSenator Randolph added as coauthor
2015-02-05SenatePlaced back on second reading
2015-02-05SenateSenator Arnold added as coauthor
2015-02-05SenateSenator Head added as third author
2015-02-03SenateSenator Steele added as second author
2015-02-03SenateSenator Steele removed as coauthor
2015-02-02SenateAmendment #1 (Grooms) prevailed; voice vote
2015-02-02SenateSecond reading: amended, ordered engrossed
2015-01-29SenateCommittee report: amend do pass, adopted
2015-01-20SenateSenator Steele added as coauthor
2015-01-12SenateFirst Reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
2015-01-12SenateAuthored by Senator Grooms

Indiana State Sources


Bill Comments

feedback