Bill Text: IL SB0672 | 2021-2022 | 102nd General Assembly | Introduced

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Amends the Illinois Freedom to Work Act. Provides that a covenant not to compete shall not be valid or enforceable unless the employee's actual or expected annualized rate of earnings exceeds $75,000 per year on the effective date of the amendatory Act, $80,000 per year beginning on January 1, 2027, $85,000 per year beginning on January 1, 2032, or $90,000 per year beginning on January 1, 2037 (rather than no employer shall enter into a covenant not to compete with any low-wage employee of the employer). Provides that a covenant not to solicit shall not be valid or enforceable unless the employee's actual or expected annualized rate of earnings exceeds $45,000 per year and increasing in steps to $52,500 per year in 2037. Provides that a covenant not to compete is void and illegal for any employee who an employer terminates or furloughs or lays off as the result of business circumstances or governmental orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic, or under circumstances that are similar to the COVID-19 pandemic, unless enforcement of the covenant not to compete includes compensation equivalent to the employee's base salary at the time of termination for the period of enforcement minus compensation earned through subsequent employment during the period of enforcement. Provides that a covenant not to compete is void and illegal for individuals covered by a collective bargaining agreement under the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act or the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act or individuals employed in construction. Establishes exclusions for management professional personnel engaged in the construction industry. Provides a procedure for enforcement by the Attorney General. Contains provisions concerning the enforceability of a covenant not to compete or a covenant not to solicit; notice requirements for employers under a covenant not to compete or a covenant not to solicit; remedies for employees who prevail against an employer's civil action to enforce a covenant not to compete or a covenant not to solicit; and certain factors a court may consider when determining whether to reform a covenant not to compete or a covenant not to solicit. Defines "adequate consideration"; "covenant not to compete"; "covenant not to solicit"; "earnings"; "employee"; and "construction". Removes the definition for the term "low-wage employee". Contains a severability clause. Effective January 1, 2022.

Spectrum: Moderate Partisan Bill (Democrat 18-2)

Status: (Passed) 2021-08-13 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 102-0358 [SB0672 Detail]

Download: Illinois-2021-SB0672-Introduced.html


102ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2021 and 2022
SB0672

Introduced 2/25/2021, by Sen. Melinda Bush

SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
New Act

Creates the Fair Food Delivery Act. Prohibits a third-party delivery service from using the likeness, registered trademark, or intellectual property belonging to a merchant without obtaining written consent from the merchant for the use of the likeness, trademark, or other intellectual property. Provides that an agreement subject to the Act may not include a provision that requires a merchant to indemnify a third-party delivery service, an independent contractor acting on behalf of the third-party delivery service, or a registered agent of the third-party delivery service for any damages or harm that may occur after the merchant's product leaves the merchant's place of business. Authorizes recovery of actual damages or $5,000, whichever is greater. Imposes a civil penalty of not more than $1,000 per violation. Provides that each day a violation occurs constitutes a separate violation. Defines terms. Effective immediately.
LRB102 10211 JLS 15534 b

A BILL FOR

SB0672LRB102 10211 JLS 15534 b
1 AN ACT concerning business.
2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3represented in the General Assembly:
4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Fair
5Food Delivery Act.
6 Section 5. Definitions. In this Act:
7 "Agreement" means a written contractual agreement between
8the merchant and a third-party delivery service.
9 "Customer" means the person, business, or other entity
10that places an order for merchant products through the
11marketplace.
12 "Likeness" means identifiable symbols attributed and
13easily identified as belonging to a specific merchant or
14retailer.
15 "Marketplace" means a third party's proprietary online
16communication platform by means of which customers may view,
17search, or place orders for the products of merchants via the
18third party's website or mobile application for delivery by
19the third party to the customer.
20 "Merchant" means a restaurant or other retail entity.
21 "Third-party delivery service" means a company,
22organization, or entity outside of the operation of the
23merchant's business that provides limited delivery services to

SB0672- 2 -LRB102 10211 JLS 15534 b
1customers.
2 Section 10. Third-party use of merchant trademarks and
3likenesses. A third-party delivery service may not use the
4likeness, registered trademark, or intellectual property
5belonging to a merchant without obtaining written consent from
6the merchant for the use of the likeness, trademark, or other
7intellectual property.
8 Section 15. Indemnity agreement void. An agreement subject
9to this Act may not include a provision that requires a
10merchant to indemnify a third-party delivery service, an
11independent contractor acting on behalf of the third-party
12delivery service, or a registered agent of the third-party
13delivery service for any damages or harm that may occur after
14the merchant's product leaves the merchant's place of
15business.
16 Section 20. Enforcement and penalties.
17 (a) A merchant whose likeness is used by a third-party
18delivery service in violation of this Act may bring an action
19in the circuit court in the county in which the merchant or
20third-party delivery service conducts business to recover
21actual damages or $5,000, whichever is greater. The court may,
22in its discretion, award punitive damages and other equitable
23relief it deems appropriate.

SB0672- 3 -LRB102 10211 JLS 15534 b
1 (b) The court may impose upon a third-party delivery
2service found to have violated this Act a civil penalty of not
3more than $1,000 per violation payable to the State. Each day a
4violation occurs shall count as a separate violation.
5 Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon
6becoming law.
feedback