Bill Text: IA HF2012 | 2017-2018 | 87th General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: A bill for an act relating to search warrants issued in the investigation of operating-while-intoxicated violations.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2018-01-17 - Subcommittee: Windschitl, Rizer and Wolfe. H.J. 111. [HF2012 Detail]
Download: Iowa-2017-HF2012-Introduced.html
House File 2012 - Introduced HOUSE FILE BY SALMON A BILL FOR 1 An Act relating to search warrants issued in the investigation 2 of operating=while=intoxicated violations. 3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: TLSB 5151YH (3) 87 ns/rh PAG LIN 1 1 Section 1. Section 321J.10, subsection 1, Code 2018, is 1 2 amended to read as follows: 1 3 1. Refusal to consent to a test under section 321J.6 does 1 4 not prohibit the withdrawal of a specimen for chemical testing 1 5 pursuant to a search warrant issued in the investigation of 1 6 a suspected violation of section707.5or 707.6A321J.2 or 1 7 321J.2A ifall of the following grounds exist:1 8a. A traffic accident has resulted in a death or personal 1 9 injury reasonably likely to cause death.1 10b.Therethere are reasonable grounds to believe thatone or 1 11 more of the persons whose driving may have been the proximate 1 12 cause of the accidenta person was violating section 321J.2at 1 13 the time of the accidentor 321J.2A. 1 14 Sec. 2. Section 321J.10, subsection 3, paragraph c, Code 1 15 2018, is amended to read as follows: 1 16 c. The oral application testimony shall set forth facts and 1 17 information tending to establish the existence of the grounds 1 18 for the warrant and shall describe with a reasonable degree of 1 19 specificity the personor personswhose driving is believed to 1 20 have beenthe proximate cause of the accident and from whom a 1 21 specimen is to be withdrawnin violation of section 321J.2 or 1 22 321J.2A and the location where the withdrawal of the specimen 1 23or specimensis to take place. 1 24 EXPLANATION 1 25 The inclusion of this explanation does not constitute agreement with 1 26 the explanation's substance by the members of the general assembly. 1 27 Under current law, Code section 321J.10 allows the issuance 1 28 of a search warrant for the withdrawal of a specimen of breath, 1 29 urine, or blood for chemical testing based upon sworn oral 1 30 testimony communicated by telephone to a magistrate in cases 1 31 involving a traffic accident resulting in a death, or personal 1 32 injury reasonably likely to cause death, where there are 1 33 reasonable grounds to believe the person whose driving may have 1 34 been the proximate cause of the accident was operating the 1 35 vehicle while intoxicated. 2 1 This bill expands the provision to allow the issuance of such 2 2 a search warrant in any case where there are reasonable grounds 2 3 to believe a person was operating a vehicle while intoxicated. 2 4 Under current law, the act of knowingly resisting or 2 5 obstructing the withdrawal of a specimen pursuant to a 2 6 search warrant issued under Code section 321J.10 constitutes 2 7 a contempt punishable by a fine not exceeding $1,000 or 2 8 imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or both. LSB 5151YH (3) 87 ns/rh