|
THE SENATE |
S.B. NO. |
2041 |
|
THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE, 2024 |
|
|
|
STATE OF HAWAII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
A BILL FOR AN ACT
relating to procurement.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
"§103D- Definitions. As used in this part, "redevelopment" means the planning, developing, replanning, redesign, clearance, reconstruction or rehabilitation, or any combination of these, in the urban areas of state or county land, or part thereof, and the provision of the residential, commercial, industrial, public, and other structures or spaces as may be appropriate or necessary in the interest of the general welfare, including recreational and other facilities incidental or appurtenant thereto."
SECTION 2. Section 103D-302, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (f) to read as follows:
"(f) Bids shall be evaluated based on the
requirements set forth in the invitation for bids. These requirements may include criteria to
determine acceptability such as inspection, testing, quality, workmanship,
delivery, and suitability for a particular purpose. Those criteria that will affect the bid price
and be considered in evaluation for award shall be as objectively measurable as
possible, [such as] including discounts, transportation costs,
total or life cycle costs, and the bidder's past performance, if
available. The invitation for bids shall
set forth the evaluation criteria to be used.
No criteria may be used in bid evaluation that are not set forth in the
invitation for bids[.]; provided that in evaluating an invitation for
bids for the redevelopment of state or county land in urban areas located
within a one-half mile radius of mass transit stops or stations, the number of
housing units proposed in conjunction with project design and financial
feasibility shall constitute forty per cent of the
evaluation score criteria of the bids in determining the award regardless
of whether housing units are proposed to be developed."
SECTION 3. Section 103D-303, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:
"(g) Award shall be made to the responsible
offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous,
taking into consideration price and the evaluation factors set forth in the
request for proposals. No other factors
or criteria shall be used in the evaluation[.]; provided that in
evaluating requests for proposals for the redevelopment of state or county land
in urban areas located within a one-half mile radius of mass transit stops or
stations, the number of housing units proposed in conjunction with project
design and financial feasibility shall constitute forty per cent of the evaluation
score criteria in determining the award regardless of whether housing units are
proposed to be developed. The
contract file shall contain the basis on which the award is made."
SECTION 4. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
SECTION 5. This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
|
INTRODUCED BY: |
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
Report Title:
Procurement Code; Competitive Sealed Bidding; Competitive Sealed Proposals; Evaluation; State and County Redevelopment; Housing
Description:
Requires that in evaluating and determining the award for redevelopment of state or county lands through competitive sealed bidding or competitive sealed proposals, the number of housing units proposed in conjunction with project design and financial feasibility shall constitute forty per cent of the evaluation score criteria regardless of whether the development of housing is proposed. Applies to the urban areas of state or county land located within a one-half mile radius of mass transit stops or stations.
The summary description
of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is
not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.