DE HB254 | 2013-2014 | 147th General Assembly

Status

Completed Legislative Action
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Democrat 7-3)
Status: Passed on July 1 2014 - 100% progression
Action: 2014-07-01 - Signed by Governor
Text: Latest bill text (Engrossed) [HTML]

Summary

This legislation is party neutral and does not provide an advantage to either side in a lawsuit. It assists judicial economy, reduces the time and cost of litigation, and shortens the time that jurors have to serve on a given case because they would no longer have to hear unnecessary long and complicated testimony. For many years, the inflation rate for future lost wages and/or medical expenses has exceeded the economic discount rate, which means that the present value of such future lost wages and/or medical expenses is equal to or greater than their current cost. Therefore, it is unnecessary to require expensive expert testimony presented by an economist which simply repeats a well known fact to a jury or court. Other jurisdictions including Pennsylvania, have arrived at this conclusion. Kaczkowski v. Bolubasz, Supr. Ct. Of Pa., 421 A.2d 1027 (1980), (“Moreover, the Court finds as a matter of law that future inflation shall be presumed equal to future interest rates with these factors offsetting. Thus, the Courts of this Commonwealth are instructed to abandon the practice of discounting lost future earnings. By this method, the Court is able to reflect the impact of inflation in these cases without specifically submitting this question to the jury.”). And, also Gillingham v. Consol Energy, Inc., 51 A.3d 841 (2012), Pa. Super., Lexis 1061 at *54 (Pa. Super. 2012) (“...a plaintiff is not required to present expert testimony on past and lost future earnings in order to sustain a verdict...A plaintiff can base his proof in that regard on his own testimony.” (Emphasis added)). The result of this legislation will be that parties in litigation will no longer be required to spend thousands of dollars per case on obtaining expert witness testimony from economists about a matter that has been well established and accepted by Courts and the economic community, and has not been contested by either Plaintiffs or Defendants in Delaware. Other benefits of passing this legislation include reducing the amount of time Judges and jurors will have to listen to unnecessary and lengthy testimony from an expert witness about matters that are not in dispute. Furthermore, attorneys will no longer have to take pretrial depositions of experts about future medical expenses and future lost wages, and they also will not have to request, review and pay for unnecessary detailed financial reports. The legislation is party neutral and does not give any advantage to one party or another. This legislation also gives any party the option to present admissible expert opinion in either support of or in opposition to a claim for future lost wages and/or future medical expenses.

Tracking Information

Register now for our free OneVote public service or GAITS Pro trial account and you can begin tracking this and other legislation, all driven by the real-time data of the LegiScan API. Providing tools allowing you to research pending legislation, stay informed with email alerts, content feeds, and share dynamic reports. Use our new PolitiCorps to join with friends and collegaues to monitor & discuss bills through the process.

Monitor Legislation or view this same bill number from multiple sessions or take advantage of our national legislative search.

Title

An Act To Amend Title 10 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Courts And Judicial Procedure.

Sponsors


Roll Calls

2014-06-05 - Senate - Senate Third Reading (Y: 19 N: 0 NV: 1 Abs: 1) [PASS]
2014-05-15 - House - House Third Reading (Y: 39 N: 0 NV: 0 Abs: 2) [PASS]

History

DateChamberAction
2014-07-01HouseSigned by Governor
2014-06-05SenatePassed by Senate. Votes: Passed 19 YES 0 NO 1 NOT VOTING 1 ABSENT 0 VACANT
2014-06-04SenateReported Out of Committee (JUDICIARY) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits
2014-05-28SenateAssigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate
2014-05-15SenateAssigned to Committee in Senate
2014-05-15HousePassed by House of Representatives. Votes: Passed 39 YES 0 NO 0 NOT VOTING 2 ABSENT 0 VACANT
2014-05-15HouseAmendment HA 2 - Passed in House by Voice Vote
2014-05-15HouseAmendment HA 1 - Stricken
2014-05-15HouseAmendment HA 2 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
2014-05-13HouseAmendment HA 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
2014-03-26HouseReported Out of Committee (JUDICIARY) in House with 3 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits
2014-03-13HouseIntroduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

Delaware State Sources


Bill Comments

feedback