Introduced by Senator Wiener |
January 18, 2023 |
(1)
(2)
(3)(A)
(B)
(4)
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(c)Any allegation that the prosecution knew or should have known of the false nature of the evidence referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of
subdivision (b) is immaterial to the prosecution of a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (b).
(e)(1)For purposes of this section, “false evidence” includes opinions of experts that have either been repudiated by the expert who originally provided the opinion at a hearing or trial or that have been undermined by the state of scientific knowledge or later scientific research or technological advances.
(2)This section does not create additional liabilities, beyond those already recognized, for an expert who repudiates the original opinion provided at a hearing or trial or whose opinion has been undermined by scientific research, technological advancements, or because of a reasonable dispute within the expert’s relevant scientific community as to the validity of the methods, theories, research, or studies upon which the expert based their opinion.
(f)