Bill Text: CA SB490 | 2011-2012 | Regular Session | Amended

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft

---

Bill Title: Death penalty.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2011-08-25 - Hearing postponed by committee. [SB490 Detail]

Download: California-2011-SB490-Amended.html

---

BILL NUMBER: SB 490	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  JUNE 28, 2011
	AMENDED IN SENATE  MAY 31, 2011
	AMENDED IN SENATE  MAY 10, 2011
	AMENDED IN SENATE  APRIL 25, 2011

INTRODUCED BY   Senator Hancock
    (   Coauthor:   Senator
  Anderson   ) 

                        FEBRUARY 17, 2011

    An act to amend Sections 830.2, 830.5, 830.11, 6126,
6126.2, 6127.3, 6127.4, 6131, and 6132 of, and to repeal Sections
6051 and 6126.1 of, the Penal Code, relating to corrections.
  An act to amend Sections 190, 190.2, and 190.4 of, and
to repeal Sections 190.1 and 190.3 of, the Penal Code, relating to
the death penalty. 



	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   SB 490, as amended, Hancock.  Corrections: Office of the
Inspector General.   Death penalty.  
   Existing law, as added and amended by various initiatives,
including Proposition 7, approved by the voters at the November 7,
1978, statewide general election, provides for imposition of the
death penalty for murder in the first degree if certain special
circumstances are proved. Proposition 7 may only be amended by the
Legislature by a statute that becomes effective only when approved by
the electors.  
   This bill would abolish the death penalty, and provide instead for
imprisonment in the state prison for life without the possibility of
parole. The bill would halt executions unless the voters fail to
approve this bill and would provide that where a defendant or inmate
was sentenced to death prior to the date of the enactment of the
bill, upon voter approval of this bill, the defendant's or inmate's
sentence would automatically be converted to life imprisonment
without the possibility of parole. The bill would state findings and
declarations of the Legislature regarding the death penalty. The bill
would provide that it would only become effective if certain of its
provisions are submitted to and approved by the electors at the next
statewide general election.  
   (1) Existing law creates the independent Office of the Inspector
General and provides that it is not a subdivision of any other
government entity. The Inspector General and certain other employees
of the office are peace officers provided that the primary duty of
these peace officers is conducting audits of investigatory practices
and other audits, as well as conducting investigations, of the
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile
Justice, and the Board of Parole Hearings.  
   This bill would remove the Inspector General and the other
employees from peace officer status. The bill would authorize the
Inspector General and certain other employees to exercise the powers
of arrest and serving warrants, as provided.  
   (2) Existing law requires the Inspector General to, among other
things, review departmental policy and procedures, conduct audits of
investigatory practices and other audits, be responsible for
contemporaneous oversight of internal affairs investigations and the
disciplinary process, and conduct investigations of the department,
and audit each warden of an institution one year after his or her
appointment and each correctional institution at least once every 4
years. Existing law establishes within the Office of the Inspector
General a Bureau of Independent Review (BIR). Existing law requires
the Inspector General to evaluate and determine the qualifications of
each candidate for warden or superintendent, as specified. 

   This bill would remove the requirement that the Inspector General
review departmental policy and procedures, conduct audits of
investigatory practices and other audits, and conduct investigations
of the department, and instead provide that the Inspector General
shall be responsible for contemporaneous oversight of internal
affairs investigations and the disciplinary process of the department
pursuant to provisions specifying the responsibilities of the Bureau
of Independent Review. The bill would remove the requirement of the
Inspector General to audit wardens. The bill would require the
Inspector General to conduct an objective, clinically appropriate,
and metric-oriented medical inspection program to periodically review
delivery of medical care at each state prison.  
   The bill would also make conforming changes. 
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   SECTION 1.    The Legislature finds and declares all
of the following:  
   (a) It is the intent of the Legislature to replace the death
penalty with permanent imprisonment.  
   (b) The death penalty costs three times as much as permanent
imprisonment.  
   (c) A recent study published in the Loyola of Los Angeles Law
Review found that California spends $184 million a year on the death
penalty.  
   (d) The same study found that Californians have spent more than $4
billion on capital punishment since it was reinstated in 1978, or
about $308 million for each of the 13 executions carried out since
reinstatement.  
   (e) The millions of dollars spent on the death penalty could be
used to make our communities safer by funding other public safety
programs. 
   SEC. 2.    Section 190 of the   Penal Code
  is amended to read: 
   190.  (a)  (1)    Every person guilty of murder
in the first degree shall be punished by  death, 
imprisonment in the state prison for life without the possibility of
parole, or imprisonment in the state prison for a term of 25 years to
life. The penalty to be applied shall be determined as provided in
Sections  190.1,  190.2,  190.3, 
190.4, and 190.5. 
   Except 
    (2)     Except  as provided in
subdivision (b), (c), or (d), every person guilty of murder in the
second degree shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison
for a term of 15 years to life.
   (b) Except as provided in subdivision (c), every person guilty of
murder in the second degree shall be punished by imprisonment in the
state prison for a term of 25 years to life if the victim was a peace
officer, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 830.1, subdivision
(a), (b), or (c) of Section 830.2, subdivision (a) of Section
830.33, or Section 830.5, who was killed while engaged in the
performance of his or her duties, and the defendant knew, or
reasonably should have known, that the victim was a peace officer
engaged in the performance of his or her duties.
   (c) Every person guilty of murder in the second degree shall be
punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of life
without the possibility of parole if the victim was a peace officer,
as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 830.1, subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) of Section 830.2, subdivision (a) of Section 830.33, or
Section 830.5, who was killed while engaged in the performance of his
or her duties, and the defendant knew, or reasonably should have
known, that the victim was a peace officer engaged in the performance
of his or her duties, and any of the following facts has been
charged and found true:
   (1) The defendant specifically intended to kill the peace officer.

   (2) The defendant specifically intended to inflict great bodily
injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, on a peace officer.
   (3) The defendant personally used a dangerous or deadly weapon in
the commission of the offense, in violation of subdivision (b) of
Section 12022.
   (4) The defendant personally used a firearm in the commission of
the offense, in violation of Section 12022.5.
   (d) Every person guilty of murder in the second degree shall be
punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of 20 years
to life if the killing was perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm
from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the
vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury.
   (e) Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 2930) of Chapter 7 of
Title 1 of Part 3 shall not apply to reduce any minimum term of a
sentence imposed pursuant to this section. A person sentenced
pursuant to this section shall not be released on parole prior to
serving the minimum term of confinement prescribed by this section.
   SEC. 3.    Section 190.1 of the   Penal Code
  is repealed.  
   190.1.  A case in which the death penalty may be imposed pursuant
to this chapter shall be tried in separate phases as follows:
   (a) The question of the defendant's guilt shall be first
determined. If the trier of fact finds the defendant guilty of first
degree murder, it shall at the same time determine the truth of all
special circumstances charged as enumerated in Section 190.2 except
for a special circumstance charged pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 190.2 where it is alleged that the
defendant had been convicted in a prior proceeding of the offense of
murder in the first or second degree.
   (b) If the defendant is found guilty of first degree murder and
one of the special circumstances is charged pursuant to paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 190.2 which charges that the defendant
had been convicted in a prior proceeding of the offense of murder of
the first or second degree, there shall thereupon be further
proceedings on the question of the truth of such special
circumstance.
   (c) If the defendant is found guilty of first degree murder and
one or more special circumstances as enumerated in Section 190.2 has
been charged and found to be true, his sanity on any plea of not
guilty by reason of insanity under Section 1026 shall be determined
as provided in Section 190.4. If he is found to be sane, there shall
thereupon be further proceedings on the question of the penalty to be
imposed. Such proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 190.3 and 190.4. 
   SEC. 4.    Section 190.2 of the   Penal Code
  is amended to read: 
   190.2.  (a) The penalty for a defendant who is found guilty of
murder in the first degree is  death or 
imprisonment in the state prison for life without the possibility of
parole if one or more of the following special circumstances has been
found under Section 190.4 to be true:
   (1) The murder was intentional and carried out for financial gain.

   (2) The defendant was convicted previously of murder in the first
or second degree. For the purpose of this paragraph, an offense
committed in another jurisdiction, which if committed in California
would be punishable as first or second degree murder, shall be deemed
murder in the first or second degree.
   (3) The defendant, in this proceeding, has been convicted of more
than one offense of murder in the first or second degree.
   (4) The murder was committed by means of a destructive device,
bomb, or explosive planted, hidden, or concealed in any place, area,
dwelling, building, or structure, and the defendant knew, or
reasonably should have known, that his or her act or acts would
create a great risk of death to one or more human beings.
   (5) The murder was committed for the purpose of avoiding or
preventing a lawful arrest, or perfecting or attempting to perfect,
an escape from lawful custody.
   (6) The murder was committed by means of a destructive device,
bomb, or explosive that the defendant mailed or delivered, attempted
to mail or deliver, or caused to be mailed or delivered, and the
defendant knew, or reasonably should have known, that his or her act
or acts would create a great risk of death to one or more human
beings.
   (7) The victim was a peace officer, as defined in Section 830.1,
830.2, 830.3, 830.31, 830.32, 830.33, 830.34, 830.35, 830.36, 830.37,
830.4, 830.5, 830.6, 830.10, 830.11, or 830.12, who, while engaged
in the course of the performance of his or her duties, was
intentionally killed, and the defendant knew, or reasonably should
have known, that the victim was a peace officer engaged in the
performance of his or her duties; or the victim was a peace officer,
as defined in the above-enumerated sections, or a former peace
officer under any of those sections, and was intentionally killed in
retaliation for the performance of his or her official duties.
   (8) The victim was a federal law enforcement officer or agent who,
while engaged in the course of the performance of his or her duties,
was intentionally killed, and the defendant knew, or reasonably
should have known, that the victim was a federal law enforcement
officer or agent engaged in the performance of his or her duties; or
the victim was a federal law enforcement officer or agent, and was
intentionally killed in retaliation for the performance of his or her
official duties.
   (9) The victim was a firefighter, as defined in Section 245.1,
who, while engaged in the course of the performance of his or her
duties, was intentionally killed, and the defendant knew, or
reasonably should have known, that the victim was a firefighter
engaged in the performance of his or her duties.
   (10) The victim was a witness to a crime who was intentionally
killed for the purpose of preventing his or her testimony in any
criminal or juvenile proceeding, and the killing was not committed
during the commission or attempted commission, of the crime to which
he or she was a witness; or the victim was a witness to a crime and
was intentionally killed in retaliation for his or her testimony in
any criminal or juvenile proceeding. As used in this paragraph,
"juvenile proceeding" means a proceeding brought pursuant to Section
602 or 707 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
   (11) The victim was a prosecutor or assistant prosecutor or a
former prosecutor or assistant prosecutor of any local or state
prosecutor's office in this or any other state, or of a federal
prosecutor's office, and the murder was intentionally carried out in
retaliation for, or to prevent the performance of, the victim's
official duties.
   (12) The victim was a judge or former judge of any court of record
in the local, state, or federal system in this or any other state,
and the murder was intentionally carried out in retaliation for, or
to prevent the performance of, the victim's official duties.
   (13) The victim was an elected or appointed official or former
official of the federal government, or of any local or state
government of this or any other state, and the killing was
intentionally carried out in retaliation for, or to prevent the
performance of, the victim's official duties.
   (14) The murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel,
manifesting exceptional depravity. As used in this section, the
phrase "especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel, manifesting
exceptional depravity" means a conscienceless or pitiless crime that
is unnecessarily torturous to the victim.
   (15) The defendant intentionally killed the victim by means of
lying in wait.
   (16) The victim was intentionally killed because of his or her
race, color, religion, nationality, or country of origin.
   (17) The murder was committed while the defendant was engaged in,
or was an accomplice in, the commission of, attempted commission of,
or the immediate flight after committing, or attempting to commit,
the following felonies:
   (A) Robbery in violation of Section 211 or 212.5.
   (B) Kidnapping in violation of Section 207, 209, or 209.5.
   (C) Rape in violation of Section 261.
   (D) Sodomy in violation of Section 286.
   (E) The performance of a lewd or lascivious act upon the person of
a child under the age of 14 years in violation of Section 288.
   (F) Oral copulation in violation of Section 288a.
   (G) Burglary in the first or second degree in violation of Section
460.
   (H) Arson in violation of subdivision (b) of Section 451.
   (I) Train wrecking in violation of Section 219.
   (J) Mayhem in violation of Section 203.
   (K) Rape by instrument in violation of Section 289.
   (L) Carjacking, as defined in Section 215.
   (M) To prove the special circumstances of kidnapping in
subparagraph (B), or arson in subparagraph (H), if there is specific
intent to kill, it is only required that there be proof of the
elements of those felonies. If so established, those two special
circumstances are proven even if the felony of kidnapping or arson is
committed primarily or solely for the purpose of facilitating the
murder.
   (18) The murder was intentional and involved the infliction of
torture.
   (19) The defendant intentionally killed the victim by the
administration of poison.
   (20) The victim was a juror in any court of record in the local,
state, or federal system in this or any other state, and the murder
was intentionally carried out in retaliation for, or to prevent the
performance of, the victim's official duties.
   (21) The murder was intentional and perpetrated by means of
discharging a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another
person or persons outside the vehicle with the intent to inflict
death. For purposes of this paragraph, "motor vehicle" means any
vehicle as defined in Section 415 of the Vehicle Code.
   (22) The defendant intentionally killed the victim while the
defendant was an active participant in a criminal street gang, as
defined in subdivision (f) of Section 186.22, and the murder was
carried out to further the activities of the criminal street gang.
   (b) Unless an intent to kill is specifically required under
subdivision (a) for a special circumstance enumerated therein, an
actual killer, as to whom the special circumstance has been found to
be true under Section 190.4, need not have had any intent to kill at
the time of the commission of the offense which is the basis of the
special circumstance in order to suffer  death or 
confinement in the state prison for life without the possibility of
parole.
   (c) Every person, not the actual killer, who, with the intent to
kill, aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, solicits, requests,
or assists any actor in the commission of murder in the first degree
shall be punished by  death or imprisonment in the
state prison for life without the possibility of parole if one or
more of the special circumstances enumerated in subdivision (a) has
been found to be true under Section 190.4.
   (d)  (1)    Notwithstanding subdivision (c),
every person, not the actual killer, who, with reckless indifference
to human life and as a major participant, aids, abets, counsels,
commands, induces, solicits, requests, or assists in the commission
of a felony enumerated in paragraph (17) of subdivision (a) which
results in the death of some person or persons, and who is found
guilty of murder in the first degree therefor, shall be punished by
 death or  imprisonment in the state prison for life
without the possibility of parole if a special circumstance
enumerated in paragraph (17) of subdivision (a) has been found to be
true under Section 190.4. 
   The 
    (2)     The  penalty shall be
determined as provided in this section and Sections 190.1, 190.3,
190.4, and 190.5.
   SEC. 5.    Section 190.3 of the   Penal Code
  is repealed.  
   190.3.  If the defendant has been found guilty of murder in the
first degree, and a special circumstance has been charged and found
to be true, or if the defendant may be subject to the death penalty
after having been found guilty of violating subdivision (a) of
Section 1672 of the Military and Veterans Code or Sections 37, 128,
219, or 4500 of this code, the trier of fact shall determine whether
the penalty shall be death or confinement in state prison for a term
of life without the possibility of parole. In the proceedings on the
question of penalty, evidence may be presented by both the people and
the defendant as to any matter relevant to aggravation, mitigation,
and sentence including, but not limited to, the nature and
circumstances of the present offense, any prior felony conviction or
convictions whether or not such conviction or convictions involved a
crime of violence, the presence or absence of other criminal activity
by the defendant which involved the use or attempted use of force or
violence or which involved the express or implied threat to use
force or violence, and the defendant's character, background,
history, mental condition and physical condition.
   However, no evidence shall be admitted regarding other criminal
activity by the defendant which did not involve the use or attempted
use of force or violence or which did not involve the express or
implied threat to use force or violence. As used in this section,
criminal activity does not require a conviction.
   However, in no event shall evidence of prior criminal activity be
admitted for an offense for which the defendant was prosecuted and
acquitted. The restriction on the use of this evidence is intended to
apply only to proceedings pursuant to this section and is not
intended to affect statutory or decisional law allowing such evidence
to be used in any other proceedings.
   Except for evidence in proof of the offense or special
circumstances which subject a defendant to the death penalty, no
evidence may be presented by the prosecution in aggravation unless
notice of the evidence to be introduced has been given to the
defendant within a reasonable period of time as determined by the
court, prior to trial. Evidence may be introduced without such notice
in rebuttal to evidence introduced by the defendant in mitigation.
   The trier of fact shall be instructed that a sentence of
confinement to state prison for a term of life without the
possibility of parole may in future after sentence is imposed, be
commuted or modified to a sentence that includes the possibility of
parole by the Governor of the State of California.
   In determining the penalty, the trier of fact shall take into
account any of the following factors if relevant:
   (a) The circumstances of the crime of which the defendant was
convicted in the present proceeding and the existence of any special
circumstances found to be true pursuant to Section 190.1.
   (b) The presence or absence of criminal activity by the defendant
which involved the use or attempted use of force or violence or the
express or implied threat to use force or violence.
   (c) The presence or absence of any prior felony conviction.
   (d) Whether or not the offense was committed while the defendant
was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance.
   (e) Whether or not the victim was a participant in the defendant's
homicidal conduct or consented to the homicidal act.
   (f) Whether or not the offense was committed under circumstances
which the defendant reasonably believed to be a moral justification
or extenuation for his conduct.
   (g) Whether or not defendant acted under extreme duress or under
the substantial domination of another person.
   (h) Whether or not at the time of the offense the capacity of the
defendant to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform
his conduct to the requirements of law was impaired as a result of
mental disease or defect, or the affects of intoxication.
   (i) The age of the defendant at the time of the crime.
   (j) Whether or not the defendant was an accomplice to the offense
and his participation in the commission of the offense was relatively
minor.
   (k) Any other circumstance which extenuates the gravity of the
crime even though it is not a legal excuse for the crime.
   After having heard and received all of the evidence, and after
having heard and considered the arguments of counsel, the trier of
fact shall consider, take into account and be guided by the
aggravating and mitigating circumstances referred to in this section,
and shall impose a sentence of death if the trier of fact concludes
that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating
circumstances. If the trier of fact determines that the mitigating
circumstances outweigh the aggravating circumstances the trier of
fact shall impose a sentence of confinement in state prison for a
term of life without the possibility of parole. 
   SEC. 6.    Section 190.4 of the   Penal Code
  is amended to read: 
   190.4.  (a)  (1)    Whenever special
circumstances as enumerated in Section 190.2 are alleged and the
trier of fact finds the defendant guilty of first degree murder, the
trier of fact shall also make a special finding on the truth of each
alleged special circumstance. The determination of the truth of any
or all of the special circumstances shall be made by the trier of
fact on the evidence presented at the trial  or at the
hearing held pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 190.1  .

   In 
    (2)     In  case of a reasonable doubt
as to whether a special circumstance is true, the defendant is
entitled to a finding that is not true. The trier of fact shall make
a special finding that each special circumstance charged is either
true or not true. Whenever a special circumstance requires proof of
the commission or attempted commission of a crime, such crime shall
be charged and proved pursuant to the general law applying to the
trial and conviction of the crime. 
   If 
    (3)     If  the defendant was
convicted by the court sitting without a jury, the trier of fact
shall be a jury unless a jury is waived by the defendant and by the
people, in which case the trier of fact shall be the court. If the
defendant was convicted by a plea of guilty, the trier of fact shall
be a jury unless a jury is waived by the defendant and by the people.

   If 
    (4)     If  the trier of fact finds
that any one or more of the special circumstances enumerated in
Section 190.2 as charged is true,  there shall be a separate
penalty hearing, and neither the finding that any of the remaining
special circumstances charged is not true, nor if the trier of fact
is a jury, the inability of the jury to agree on the issue of the
truth or untruth of any of the remaining special circumstances
charged, shall prevent the holding of a separate penalty hearing
  the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment in
state prison for life without the possibility of parole  .

   In any case in which the defendant has been found guilty by a
jury, and the jury has been unable to reach an unanimous verdict that
one or more of the special circumstances charged are true, and does
not reach a unanimous verdict that all the special circumstances
charged are not true, the court shall dismiss the jury and shall
order a new jury impaneled to try the issues, but the issue of guilt
shall not be tried by such jury, nor shall such jury retry the issue
of the truth of any of the special circumstances which were found by
an unanimous verdict of the previous jury to be untrue. If such new
jury is unable to reach the unanimous verdict that one or more of the
special circumstances it is trying are true, the court shall dismiss
the jury and in the court's discretion shall either order a new jury
impaneled to try the issues the previous jury was unable to reach
the unanimous verdict on, or impose a punishment of confinement in
state prison for a term of 25 years.  
   (b) If defendant was convicted by the court sitting without a jury
the trier of fact at the penalty hearing shall be a jury unless a
jury is waived by the defendant and the people, in which case the
trier of fact shall be the court. If the defendant was convicted by a
plea of guilty, the trier of fact shall be a jury unless a jury is
waived by the defendant and the people.  
   If the trier of fact is a jury and has been unable to reach a
unanimous verdict as to what the penalty shall be, the court shall
dismiss the jury and shall order a new jury impaneled to try the
issue as to what the penalty shall be. If such new jury is unable to
reach a unanimous verdict as to what the penalty shall be, the court
in its discretion shall either order a new jury or impose a
punishment of confinement in state prison for a term of life without
the possibility of parole.  
   (c) 
    (b)  If the trier of fact which convicted the defendant
of a crime for which he  or she  may be subject to 
the death penalty   imprisonment in state prison for
life without the possibility of parole  was a jury, the same
jury shall consider any plea of not guilty by reason of insanity
pursuant to Section 1026, the truth of any special circumstances
which may be alleged,  and the penalty to be applied,
 unless for good cause shown the court discharges that jury
in which case a new jury shall be drawn. The court shall state facts
in support of the finding of good cause upon the record and cause
them to be entered into the minutes. 
   (d) In any case in which the defendant may be subject to the death
penalty, evidence presented at any prior phase of the trial,
including any proceeding under a plea of not guilty by reason of
insanity pursuant to Section 1026 shall be considered an any
subsequent phase of the trial, if the trier of fact of the prior
phase is the same trier of fact at the subsequent phase. 

   (e) In every case in which the trier of fact has returned a
verdict or finding imposing the death penalty, the defendant shall be
deemed to have made an application for modification of such verdict
or finding pursuant to Subdivision 7 of Section 11. In ruling on the
application, the judge shall review the evidence, consider, take into
account, and be guided by the aggravating and mitigating
circumstances referred to in Section 190.3, and shall make a
determination as to whether the jury's findings and verdicts that
                                                the aggravating
circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances are contrary to
law or the evidence presented. The judge shall state on the record
the reasons for his findings.  
   The judge shall set forth the reasons for his ruling on the
application and direct that they be entered on the Clerk's minutes.
The denial of the modification of the death penalty verdict pursuant
to subdivision (7) of Section 1181 shall be reviewed on the defendant'
s automatic appeal pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1239. The
granting of the application shall be reviewed on the People's appeal
pursuant to paragraph (6). 
   SEC. 7.    (a) The State of California shall not
carry out any execution following the enactment of this act unless
the voters fail to appeal Sections 2 to 6, inclusive, of this act.
 
   (b) In any case where a defendant or inmate was sentenced to death
prior to the date of the enactment of this act, upon voter approval
of this act, the sentence of each defendant or inmate shall
automatically be converted to life imprisonment without the
possibility of parole under the terms and conditions of this act.

   SEC. 8.    The provisions of this act are severable.
If any provision of this measure or its application is held invalid,
that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications
that can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application. 
   SEC. 9.    Sections 2 to 6, inclusive, amend or
repeal provisions of law added or amended by initiatives, and shall
only be effective if submitted to and approved by the electors at the
next statewide general election.  All matter omitted in this
version of the bill appears in the bill as amended in the Senate, May
31, 2011. (JR11)