Amended
IN
Assembly
July 05, 2018 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
June 11, 2018 |
Amended
IN
Senate
April 26, 2018 |
Amended
IN
Senate
April 10, 2018 |
Senate Bill | No. 1339 |
Introduced by Senator Stern |
February 16, 2018 |
This bill would require each local publicly owned electric utility to establish a tariff, to be available for service before January 1, 2020, for the use of microgrids to provide electrical grid resiliency.
This bill would require each
state agency to consider integrating microgrids into its infrastructure.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Climate change impacts California’s economy and residents in many ways, including by threatening critical infrastructure, increasing the frequency and severity of climate-related natural disasters, and interrupting critical services, such as the delivery of water, goods, and electricity.
(b)Critical infrastructure, including, but not limited to, hospitals, health centers, data centers, and telecommunications, energy, financial service, water, and transportation infrastructure, comprises physical and virtual systems and assets so vital to California, especially in situations requiring a rapid emergency response
or asset deployment, that the incapacity or destruction of them would have a debilitating impact on national and local security, public health and safety, and economic security.
(c)The Office of Emergency Services’ “State of California Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment” outlined capability targets for infrastructure systems, including to stabilize critical infrastructure functions, such as energy, transportation, telecommunications, water and wastewater services, and public health and medical systems, within the first 72 hours after an incident.
(d)A resilient energy system that is built with the capacity to withstand and rapidly recover from a service disruption, including, but not limited to, a deliberate attack, or an accident, fire, flood, mudslide, or other natural disaster, is necessary to preserve the economic vitality, public health and safety, and
well-being of California’s citizenry in the face of natural threats to, or other interruptions of, California’s electrical supply.
(e)Microgrids, and other distributed energy resources and transmission improvements, can make the electrical grid more resilient during and after disruptive events, as a potential source of backup generation and durable supply, to support and aid in the recovery of critical infrastructure functions in emergencies or during disruptions to the electrical supply. Generally, microgrids can enhance system reliability, provide economic benefits, and help the state meet its clean energy and greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals.
(f)Microgrids can also reduce California’s reliance on diesel-fired backup generation resources and thereby help to achieve the state’s aggressive air quality goals, which were furthered by the enactment of Chapters 135 and 136
of the Statutes of 2017, and to ensure all communities achieve high air quality levels. The effects noted in subdivision (e) and this subdivision motivate the adoption of technology solutions with minimal negative impacts to local air pollution, like microgrids.
(g)Each utility should work to incorporate an electrical grid resiliency plan into its overall distribution grid planning process. The plan should identify the investments necessary to increase the resiliency of the electrical grid and reduce the risk of electrical outages affecting emergency services, critical circuits, and critical infrastructure, and should explain how the plan’s execution would increase grid resiliency in a manner that both maximizes the benefits and minimizes the costs to ratepayers.
(h)Additionally, the appropriate
state energy agencies, including the Public Utilities Commission and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, should, based on the best available data, in consultation with other agencies or entities as appropriate, including, but not limited to, the Office of Emergency Services, the Independent System Operator, and the United States Department of Homeland Security, review the electrical grid resiliency plans and associated investment strategies.
(i)California could benefit from the implementation of microgrids at state-owned facilities and other critical infrastructure sites.
(d)(1)
(2)A microgrid may be owned by a large electrical corporation, as defined in Section 2827, local publicly owned electric utility, community choice aggregator, third
party, or customer.
(e)“Resiliency,” as it relates to the electrical grid, for purposes of a local publicly owned electric utility, means the ability of the electrical grid to adapt to changing weather or other conditions, and to withstand and rapidly recover from disruptions caused by an emergency, natural disaster, or other disturbance.
(a)The commission, as part of commission Rulemaking 14-07-002 (July 10, 2014), Order Instituting Rulemaking to Develop a Successor to Existing Net Energy Metering Tariffs Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 2827.1, and to Address Other Issues Related to Net Energy Metering, and in consultation with the Energy Commission, shall consider the role of microgrids in providing grid resiliency, and shall establish a tariff for each electrical corporation for the use of microgrids to provide electrical grid resiliency, as “grid resiliency” is defined by the commission. The commission shall not permit a microgrid that uses
diesel backup or gas-combustion generation.
(b)As part of the rulemaking described in subdivision (a), the commission shall consider all of the following:
(1)The size limitations of microgrids, including megawatts, customers served, and other criteria.
(2)The criteria for establishing a tariff or rate schedule by which a microgrid that can demonstrate grid islanding capacity may expeditiously interconnect to, and nondiscriminatorily access, an electrical corporation’s electrical distribution grid.
(3)The criteria to account
for the operational and societal benefits of microgrids generally and ratepayer benefits specifically.
(4)The terms of the microgrid tariffs with respect to rate structure, retail rate components, and monthly charges, and the potential to conform some portion of those terms with the corresponding terms in the contract or tariff to which a customer would be
assigned if the customer was not an eligible microgrid resource.
(5)The use of a demand charge, standby charge, customer charge, minimum monthly charge, interconnection charge, or other charge that would increase a microgrid’s costs.
(6)The conditions under which a microgrid customer shall receive the net energy metering benefits
established pursuant to Section 2827.1 for any excess generation the customer exports to the electrical grid.
(c)The commission shall direct each electrical corporation to file an advice letter to implement the tariff described in subdivision (a). The commission shall approve, reject, or modify each advice letter before January 1, 2020. The commission shall approve an advice letter only if it minimizes costs and maximizes benefits to all ratepayers and meets the requirements of the rulemaking described in subdivision (a).
(b)In establishing a tariff pursuant to subdivision (a), the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility shall consider all the following:
(1)The size limitations of microgrids, including megawatts, customers served, and other criteria.
(2)The criteria by which a microgrid that can
demonstrate grid islanding capacity may expeditiously interconnect to, and nondiscriminatorily access, the local publicly owned electric utility’s electrical distribution grid.
(3)The criteria to account for the operational and societal benefits of microgrids generally and ratepayer benefits specifically.
(4)The terms of the microgrid tariff with respect to rate structure, retail rate components, and monthly charges, and the potential to conform some portion of those terms with the corresponding terms in the contract or tariff to which a customer would be assigned if the customer was not an eligible microgrid resource.
(5)The use of a demand charge, standby charge, customer charge, minimum monthly charge, interconnection charge, or other charge that would increase a microgrid’s costs.
(6)The conditions under which a microgrid customer shall receive the net energy metering benefits established pursuant to Section 2827 for any excess generation the customer exports to the electrical grid.
Each state agency shall consider integrating microgrids into its infrastructure.