SEC. 2.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) This act is necessary for all of the following reasons:
(1) All California pupils deserve an education worthy of their potential. For too long, this education has been out of reach for many pupils with disabilities.
(2) Research shows that inclusion in general education classrooms improves academic and social outcomes for pupils with disabilities. When educated in inclusive classrooms, pupils with disabilities achieve higher academic performance, exhibit greater social
competence, form more meaningful friendships, exhibit less disruptive behaviors, demonstrate improved communication and literacy skills, and have improved post-high school outcomes in the areas of employment and independent living.
(3) Inclusion benefits pupils without disabilities, too. Pupils without disabilities make comparable or greater gains in math and reading when learning alongside their peers with disabilities. They also benefit in nonacademic ways, including increased awareness and tolerance of differences, growth in social cognition, improvements in self-concept, and greater empathy.
(4) A significant challenge in the implementation of inclusive
practices is the lack of support, resources, and clear guidance for teachers and staff. Implementing inclusion requires teachers and administrators to have the knowledge, resources, and support necessary to effectively teach all pupils.
(5) The Statewide Task Force on Special Education report from 2015 notes that, “the application of Universal Design for Learning in all of its inclusive implications sets the foundation for a coherent system of education that provides instruction, services, and supports to pupils as they are needed,” and recommends that California ensure that “Universal Design for Learning is understood, is established as a key area of professional learning for educator training, and is implemented in all schools. When the Instructional Quality Commission reviewed instructional materials for its mathematics
adoption in 2013, its evaluation criteria included a requirement that “materials incorporate instructional strategies to address the needs of pupils with disabilities in both lessons and teacher’s editions, as appropriate, at every grade level and course level,” as required by current law. The evaluation criteria include a section on “universal access” but do not specifically reference universal design for learning.
(6) An inclusive classroom is one where pupils with disabilities are not merely present but are meaningfully participating as members of the school community.
(b) The Legislature further finds and declares all of the following:
(1) Every pupil needing special education services in kindergarten through 22
years of age is covered by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. Sec. 1400 et seq.) as
amended, and its implementing regulations (34 C.F.R. 300 et seq.). This federal law states that every child with disabilities is entitled to a free and appropriate education, with special education services delivered in the least restrictive environment possible as determined by the pupil’s individualized education program (IEP) team, and must be provided with specially designed instruction according to each pupils’s IEP.
(2) A large body of research shows that inclusive classroom environments where pupils with disabilities are included in general education classrooms and less restrictive environments benefit pupils both with and without disabilities, and that for pupils with disabilities in particular, greater inclusion brings improvements in pupil academic achievement, engagement, behavior, communication, social skills, and
self-esteem.
(3) Despite federal and state guidelines making sure pupils with disabilities receive an outcomes-focused education resulting in college and career success, many pupils with disabilities and their families are being left behind in California.
(4) For the 2017–18 school year, California had one of the lowest inclusion rates in the country; 56 percent compared to a national average of 63.4 percent, ranking California at 40th out of 47 states on this measure.
(5) In 2019, 333 local educational agencies were identified for differentiated assistance; over one-half of these school districts, 187, were mandated for assistance, at least in part, because pupils with disabilities in the school district were performing
poorly, particularly in the state priority areas of pupil achievement and pupil engagement.
(6) Moreover, in California, for every 1000 pupils, 66 pupils with disabilities are suspended compared to 30 pupils without disabilities.
(7) Educator preparation programs in California are required to include instruction on special education inclusive practice, laws, and regulations for general education teacher candidates, but this requirement is minimal and it is implemented unevenly in many teacher training programs, creating great variability among educators on the knowledge of federal and state laws regarding special education and best practices for inclusive classrooms.
(8) Many general education faculty in educator
preparation programs have not had direct instruction or experience in inclusive education practices, which inhibits comprehensive understanding by the credentialing candidates of these practices.
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that all educators, including paraeducators, special services providers, principals, and administrators should be mentored and evaluated on efficacy of delivery of inclusive practices of special education laws and requirements and effective special education practices, specifically including, but not limited to, inclusive learning environments, as part of the preservice training requirements for the issuing of general education teacher and administrator credentials, and that the teaching of special education laws and effective special education practices should be required for all teacher candidates in
California’s educator preparation programs. General education faculty in institutions of higher education and other California educator preparation programs must be trained in this area.