Bill Text: CA AB756 | 2017-2018 | Regular Session | Amended
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Prima facie speed limits: Golden Gate Park.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2018-02-01 - From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. [AB756 Detail]
Download: California-2017-AB756-Amended.html
Drive and Drive, Park Presidio Bypass Boulevard, and Kezar Drive, shall be 15 miles per hour, in order to maintain pedestrian and bicyclist safety. The prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice of that speed limit are erected along the street or road.
Bill Title: Prima facie speed limits: Golden Gate Park.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2018-02-01 - From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. [AB756 Detail]
Download: California-2017-AB756-Amended.html
Amended
IN
Assembly
March 22, 2017 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2017–2018 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill | No. 756 |
Introduced by Assembly Member Ting |
February 15, 2017 |
An act to add Section 22352.5 to the Vehicle Code, relating to speed limits.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 756, as amended, Ting.
Prima facie speed limits: Golden Gate Park.
Existing law establishes prima facie speed limits, including 15 miles per hour and 25 miles per hour, for various circumstances relating to traversing a railway grade crossing, approaching or passing a school building, and passing a senior center, among others. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime.
This bill would establish a prima facie speed limit of 15 miles per hour when driving on a street or road, with specified exclusions, within Golden Gate Park in the City of San Francisco, as prescribed. Because the bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for Golden Gate Park in the City of San Francisco.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.