Bill Text: CA AB1542 | 2021-2022 | Regular Session | Amended

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: County of Yolo: Secured Residential Treatment Program.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)

Status: (Engrossed) 2021-07-15 - Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. [AB1542 Detail]

Download: California-2021-AB1542-Amended.html

Amended  IN  Assembly  March 30, 2021

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2021–2022 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Bill
No. 1542


Introduced by Assembly Member McCarty
(Coauthor: Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry)
(Coauthor: Senator Dodd)

February 19, 2021


An act to add and repeal Section 1203.44 of the Penal Code, relating to drug treatment.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 1542, as amended, McCarty. County of Yolo: Secured Residential Treatment Program.
Existing law authorizes a court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant in specified cases, including when the defendant is suffering from a mental disorder, specified controlled substances crimes, and when the defendant was, or currently is, a member of the United States military. Existing law imposes various fines, fees, penalties, and assessments on a defendant in a criminal proceeding, including the fine set by statute, restitution fines and fees, and assessments to support the state court system.
This bill would, until January 1, 2025, authorize the County of Yolo to offer a pilot program, known as the Secured Residential Treatment Program, for individuals suffering from substance use disorders (SUDs) who have been convicted of drug-motivated crimes as a result of their SUDs that victimize others, qualifying drug-motivated felony crimes, as specified. The bill would require the program to meet certain conditions relating to, among other things, a risk and needs assessment, a comprehensive curriculum, a determination by a judge of the length of treatment, data collection, and reporting to the Legislature.
The bill would authorize the court to divert an individual and sentence them to confinement in a secured residential treatment facility within the pilot program, if the court determines that the crime was caused in whole or in part by that individual’s SUD. require the judge to offer the defendant voluntary participation in the pilot program, as an alternative to a jail or prison sentence otherwise imposed, if the defendant’s crime was caused in whole or in part by the defendant’s SUD, the crime was not a sex crime, serious or violent felony, or nonviolent drug possession, and the judge makes their determination based on the recommendations of the treatment providers and on a finding by the health and human services agency of the county that the defendant’s participation would be appropriate. The bill would require the preparation of a report with input from interested parties, to assist the court in making its determination.
If the participant successfully completes the court-ordered drug treatment pursuant to the pilot program, the bill would require the court to expunge the conviction from the participant’s record and would authorize the court to expunge the conviction of any previous drug possession or drug use crimes on the participant’s record. If the participant fails to complete the court-ordered drug treatment, the bill would require the court to resentence the defendant according to law.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Yolo.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(a)People suffering from substance use disorders (SUDs) often commit crimes that victimize others to support their SUDs.

(a) A significant percentage of people arrested and charged with crimes in the County of Yolo suffer from substance use disorders (SUDs).
(b) For many individuals suffering from SUDs, residential and professionally conducted evidence-based treatment programs are the only best, or at times only, option for getting this population well.

(c)Existing laws in California, including provisions added by Proposition 47, as approved by the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, and Proposition 36, as approved by the voters at the November 7, 2000, statewide general election, have removed the possibility of felony charges for many of the most common drug offenses.

(d)Prior to the enactment of Proposition 47, given the choice between a possible felony conviction and a statutorily authorized drug treatment program, many individuals in this population opted for the drug treatment program and, as a result, many got well.

(e)With Propositions 47 and 36 in place, the number of individuals charged with drug possession offenses entering statutorily authorized treatment programs has dwindled. Since 2014, drug court participation in California has decreased, with the percentage of this population entering these programs decreasing by 86 percent in the County of Yolo.

(f)

(c) Our efforts in California in treating those with SUDs, many who suffer from SUDs, some of whom are homeless, have been an abject failure. unsuccessful. Although there have been efforts to treat this population, to date, there has been little-to-no limited success.

(g)

(d) For those with SUDs who commit crimes that victimize others (drug-motivated crimes), who suffer from SUDs and who commit drug-motivated crimes, as an alternative to a jail or prison sentence, they could consent to be diverted to a secure treatment center, secured residential treatment facility, where they would receive evidence-based treatment to get them well and give them the opportunity to become healthy, fulfilled, and contributing members of society. One goal of this pilot program is to reduce recidivism.
(e) If the pilot program is established, eligible individuals who could consent to this alternative to sentencing in jail or prison would generally be individuals who suffer from an SUD that is determined to be the driving force behind the crime, and whereby the crime is not a simple drug possession offense, and the individual, but for this voluntary program, would be sentenced to jail or prison as a result of the crime.

SEC. 2.

 Section 1203.44 is added to the Penal Code, to read:

1203.44.
 (a) The County of Yolo may offer a pilot program, known as the Secured Residential Treatment Program, consistent with this section for individuals suffering from substance use disorders (SUDs) who have been convicted of drug-motivated crimes as a result of their SUDs that victimize others, pursuant to subdivision (b), felony crimes that qualify pursuant to the criteria and conditions described in subdivisions (b) and (c). If offered, the pilot program shall align with the resolution adopted by the County of Yolo in 2015 in recognition of the national Stepping Up Initiative, with the goal of ensuring that people with behavioral health conditions receive treatment out of custody wherever possible. The County of Yolo may offer the pilot program to eligible individuals if the program meets all of the following conditions:
(1) The county develops the program in consultation with drug treatment service providers and other relevant community partners.
(2) The staff of the health and human services agency of the county Yolo County Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) performs a risk and needs assessment, utilizing an assessment tool demonstrated to be appropriate for drug offenders, for each offender entering the program.
(3) The individual, as an alternative to a jail or prison sentence, consents to participate in the program.

(3)

(4) The participant’s treatment, in terms of length and intensity, within the program is solely based on the findings of the risk and needs assessment and the recommendations of treatment providers.

(4)

(5) The program includes components that are evidence-based or promising practices.

(5)

(6) The program has a comprehensive written curriculum that informs the operations of the program and outlines the treatment and intervention modalities.

(6)

(7) A judge determines the length of the treatment program after being informed by by, and based on, the risk and needs assessment and recommendations of treatment providers. After leaving the secured residential treatment facility, the participant continues outpatient treatment for a period of time and may also be referred to a “step-down” residential treatment facility. facility, subject to the time limit described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c).
(8) The program includes a continuum of care and intensive followup services for participants.

(7)

(9) Treatment provided to a participant during the program is reimbursable under the Medi-Cal program, to the extent that the participant is a Medi-Cal beneficiary and the treatment is already covered under the Medi-Cal program, and to the extent that reimbursement is not prohibited under federal law.
(10) An outcome measures report is completed by a local independent evaluator.

(8)

(11) The county collects and monitors all of the following data for participants in the program:
(A) The participant’s demographic information, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, familial status, and employment status.
(B) The participant’s criminal history.
(C) The participant’s risk level, as determined by the risk and needs assessment.
(D) The treatment provided to the participant during the program, and if the participant completed that treatment.
(E) The participant’s outcome at the time of program completion and completion, six months after completion, and one year after completion, including subsequent arrests and convictions.

(9)

(12) The county reports all of the following information annually to the Legislature, in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code:
(A) The risk and needs assessment tool used for the program.
(B) The curriculum used by each program.
(C) The number of participants with a program length other than one year and the alternative program lengths used.
(D) Individual data on the number of participants participating in the program.
(E) Individual data for the items described in paragraph (8). (11).
(F) A one-, three-, and five-year evaluation of the number of subsequent arrests and convictions of the participants.
(b) (1) Eligible drug-motivated crimes shall include any felony crime other than sex the following:
(A) Sex crimes as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 290, other than “serious” 290.
(B) “Serious” felonies as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 or in Section 1192.8, and other than “violent” 1192.8.
(C) “Violent” felonies as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a “nonviolent drug possession offense” specified in subdivision (a) of Section 1210 may not be diverted pursuant to this program.

(c)Subject to the County of Yolo opting to offer the pilot program described in this section, if a peace officer arrests a person for a drug-motivated crime and, at the time of the arrest, has probable cause to believe that the person suffers from a SUD that is in whole or in part a cause for the crime committed, the peace officer shall state that belief in the probable cause declaration in support of the arrest.

(d)At the time of sentencing or pronouncement of judgment in which sentencing is imposed, if the court determines that the defendant’s crime was caused in whole or in part by that individual’s SUD, as an alternative to jail, the court may divert the individual and sentence them to confinement in a secured residential treatment facility within the pilot program.

(c) (1) At the time of sentencing or pronouncement of judgment in which sentencing is imposed, the judge shall offer the defendant voluntary participation in the pilot program, as an alternative to a jail or prison sentence that the judge would otherwise impose, consistent with the other provisions of this section and if all of the following conditions are met:
(A) The defendant’s crime was caused in whole or in part by the defendant’s SUD.
(B) The defendant’s crime meets the criteria described in subdivision (b).
(C) The judge makes their determination based on the recommendations of the treatment providers who conducted the assessment and on a finding by HHSA that the defendant’s participation in the program would be appropriate.

(1)

(2) The amount of time in a the secured residential treatment facility pursuant to the program, shall be based on the recommendations of the treatment providers who conducted the assessment. The amount of time, combined with any outpatient treatment or “step-down” residential treatment pursuant to the program, shall not exceed the maximum allowable jail or prison time for the drug-motivated crime, and the court shall not place the defendant on probation for the underlying offense.

(2)

(3) During the period in which an individual is participating in the pilot program, the individual shall be on informal supervision with the court, to be supervised by treatment providers under the health and human services agency of the county or a SUD treatment program contracted with the agency. probation department.

(e)

(d) To assist the court in making the determination pursuant to subdivision (d), (c), a report shall be prepared with input from any of the interested parties, including the district attorney, the attorney for the participant, the probation department, the health and human services agency, HHSA, and any contracted drug treatment program provider.

(f)

(e) If the court court, based on the recommendations of the treatment providers, determines that the participant should be transferred out of the secure secured residential treatment phase of the program prior to the end of the original order, the court shall make that subsequent order. After transferring out of the secured residential treatment facility, the participant shall continue to be supervised in the program by the health and human services agency and probation department of the county HHSA and the probation department for the duration of the sentence.

(g)

(f) If the participant successfully completes the court-ordered drug treatment pursuant to this program, the court shall expunge the conviction from the participant’s record. The court shall also have discretion to expunge the conviction of any previous drug possession or drug use crimes on the participant’s record, including those offenses listed in Sections 11350, 11364, 11377, and 11550 of the Health and Safety Code.

(h)If the participant fails to successfully complete the court-ordered drug treatment pursuant to this program, the court shall resentence the defendant according to law.

(i)

(g) The court shall ensure that the rights of any victim pursuant to Section 28 of Article I of the California Constitution (Marsy’s Law) are honored before expunging the conviction.

(j)

(h) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2025, and as of that date is repealed.

SEC. 3.

 The Legislature finds and declares that a special statute is necessary and that a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because of the unique circumstances that the County of Yolo has experienced with regard to difficulties in treating individuals who have been convicted of drug-motivated crimes as a result of their substance use disorders.
feedback