Bill Text: NJ S1859 | 2014-2015 | Regular Session | Introduced


Bill Title: Clarifies that electronic funds transfers are included within the scope of the statute concerning issuing or passing bad checks.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-06-23 - Substituted by A1153 [S1859 Detail]

Download: New_Jersey-2014-S1859-Introduced.html

SENATE, No. 1859

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

216th LEGISLATURE

 

INTRODUCED MARCH 24, 2014

 


 

Sponsored by:

Senator  CHRISTOPHER "KIP" BATEMAN

District 16 (Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex and Somerset)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Clarifies that electronic funds transfers are included within the scope of the statute concerning issuing or passing bad checks.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

  


An Act concerning electronic funds transfer and amending N.J.S.2C:21-5.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.    N.J.S.2C:21-5 is amended to read as follows:

     2C:21-5. A person who issues or passes a check or similar sight order for the payment of money, or authorizes an electronic funds transfer, knowing that it will not be honored by the drawee, commits an offense as provided for in subsection c. of this section.  For the purposes of this section as well as in any prosecution for theft committed by means of a bad check, an issuer is presumed to know that the check [or], money order, or electronic funds transfer (other than a post-dated check [or], money order, or electronic funds transfer) would not be paid, if:

     a.    The issuer had no account with the drawee at the time the check or money order was issued or the electronic funds transfer was made; or

     b.    Payment was refused by the drawee for lack of funds, or due to a closed account, after a deposit by the payee into a bank for collection or after presentation to the drawee within 46 days after issue, and the issuer failed to make good within 10 days after receiving notice of that refusal or after notice has been sent to the issuer's last known address.  Notice of refusal may be given to the issuer orally or in writing in any reasonable manner by any person.

     c.    An offense under this section is:

     (1)   a crime of the second degree if the amount of the check [or], money order, or electronic funds transfer is $75,000.00 or more;

     (2)   a crime of the third degree if the amount of the check [or] , money order, or electronic funds transfer is $1,000.00 or more but is less than $75,000.00;

     (3)   a crime of the fourth degree if the amount of the check [or] , money order, or electronic funds transfer is $200.00 or more but is less than $1,000.00;

     (4)   a disorderly persons offense if the amount of the check [or, money order , or electronic funds transfer is less than $200.00.

(cf: P.L. 2002, c.65, s.1)

 

     2.    This act shall take effect immediately.


STATEMENT

 

     This bill amends N.J.S.2C:21-5, a criminal statute which concerns the issuing or passing of bad checks, to clarify that an electronic funds transfer is included within the scope of the offense. 

     Currently, a person commits an offense under this statute if he issues or passes a check or money order knowing that it will not be honored by the drawee. The bill would clarify that a person also commits an offense under this statute if he authorizes an electronic funds transfer knowing that it will not be honored by the drawee.

     The grading for this offense would remain the same:

     (1)   if the amount of the check, money order, or electronic funds transfer is $75,000 or more it is a crime of the second degree;

     (2)   if the amount of the check, money order, or electronic funds transfer is $1,000 or more, but less than $75,000, it is a crime of the third degree;

     (3)   if the amount of the check, money order, or electronic funds transfer is $200 or more, but less than $1,000, it is a crime of the fourth degree; and

     (4)   if the amount of the check, money order, or electronic funds transfer is less than $200 it is a disorderly persons offense.

feedback